free esop resources

Explore our collection of resources for your upcoming ESOP in Southeast Asia.

get in touch
return to resources

ESOP guides for your company

Browse our free m&a templates and get familiar with disclosure letters, term sheets, and more.

5 key questions to consider when setting up an ESOP

Employee share option plans (or ESOPs) are a key tool for startups to incentivise staff and hire talent when funds are tight.

However, not all ESOPs are made the same. To make it easy, we’ve put together this guide to help you through the main commercial questions you need to consider. If you want some guidance on the process of adopting your ESOP, setting up the option pool, and granting options, read our guide on how to set up an ESOP.

1) how big should your pool of options be?

Usually an ESOP pool is around 7.5-15% of a company’s total shares on a fully diluted basis (10% is most common). If you are setting up an ESOP as part of a capital raising transaction, your incoming investors may have specific requirements around this.

Generally speaking, founders are expected to take on the dilution from setting up an ESOP pool, and investors are not (i.e. an investor’s agreed stake in the company is calculated on a fully diluted basis, taking the ESOP pool into account even if the ESOP has not been formally put in place yet).

This means it’s important to make sure your ESOP pool is not significantly larger than required for your foreseeable hiring needs, as that chunk of equity comes out of your own pocket as a founder. Conversely, you’ll generally want to make sure you’ve set up a big enough pool to attract and retain the talent you’ll need.

2) how much will it cost employees to exercise their options?

The exercise price is the price that an employee must pay to exercise their options and is decided on a case-by-case basis for each employee. The exercise price is often set at the market price of the company’s shares at the time the options are granted (usually determined by reference to the latest completed funding round). Employees then benefit as the value of the company increases from the date they received their options.

3) how long will employees have to exercise their options?

The expiry date of an option is the latest date by which the option holder can exercise that option. This is typically aligned with the expected time frame for the company to find an exit. Typically in Southeast Asia this will be 7-10 years from the date of grant, but of course this depends on your company’s stage and maturity.

The expiry date may change if an employee ceases to work for the company. The most employee-friendly ESOPs do not change the expiry date if any employee leaves. Leavers are therefore not forced into exercising options prior to an exit event. However, some companies prefer to give leavers a shorter time frame, for example up to one year after leaving the company to exercise any vested options. This lowers the company’s administrative burden of keeping track of departed employees who hold options.

4) what is the timetable for the options to vest?

Options almost always vest over a 3 or 4-year period. Vesting incentivises employees to stay with the company throughout the vesting period, in order to be able to exercise all of their options in the future. Generally, if an option holder leaves before the end of the vesting period, he or she will lose their unvested shares.

Our template ESOP rules allow for recipients to have personalised vesting schedules on a case-by-case basis. Shorter vesting periods may be appropriate for employees who have already worked for the company for a significant period of time prior to receiving options.

5) what happens at an exit event?

This is likely to be the part of your ESOP which requires the most thought.

Our template rules provide for single-trigger acceleration on an exit; that is, all unvested options vest on an exit event and can be exercised in full. Single trigger acceleration is the most employee-friendly position and encourages all parties to push for an exit as soon as possible.

However, potential acquirers of your company can be put off by single trigger acceleration, as they often want key employees to stay with the business after the acquisition (and the continued vesting of options encourages that). Some companies therefore prefer double trigger acceleration in order to make their company as attractive an acquisition target as possible.

We find there is a lot of variation in Southeast Asia on this point. Single trigger remains the most common, as compared to the US, where double trigger acceleration is more usual.

The different scenarios are summarised below:

no acceleration

 None of the unvested options vest on an exit event, and any unvested options expire. Option holders can only exercise options which have vested.
partial acceleration

 A set percentage of the unvested options vest on an exit event. The remaining options continue to vest in accordance with the vesting schedule.

This can be important to a buyer where employees remain employed by the surviving entity, so that they continue to work for the business and earn their options. However, it can be less appealing to employees, who will lose unvested options even if they are terminated without cause.
double trigger acceleration

 A set percentage of the unvested options vest on an exit event. The remaining options vest on a second trigger, e.g. the employee being terminated (or resigns with good reason) in connection with, and within a certain time after, the exit event.

That way, if the second trigger event does not occur, the employee must stay with the company in order to earn their remaining unvested shares. However, if a buyer does not choose to keep an employee after an exit, the employee is not penalised for this.

In Southeast Asia, we do not see double trigger acceleration very often but expect that to change as some of the larger tech companies adopt Silicon Valley practices.

Despite ESOPs being a common feature of many startups in Southeast Asia, their implementation can vary according to founder and investor needs. If you would like to discuss drafting an ESOP for your own startup, you can contact us.

how to calculate your ESOP pool shares

This short guide demonstrates how founders should calculate the number of options to include in their ESOP pool.

For the purposes of this example we have assumed that the founders are setting up a customary 10% ESOP pool (check out our guide 5 key questions when setting up an ESOP for a more detailed discussion on the appropriate size of your ESOP).

example

In almost all cases you should calculate the size of your ESOP pool on a fully diluted basis. i.e. the ESOP should be equal to 10% of all shares and options on issue (including the ESOP). Looking at a company with 1,000,000 shares on issue:

tool

If you are experiencing some arithmetic fatigue, we have you covered. Available for free download here is a spreadsheet tool that incorporates the above formula. All you need to do is plug in your total number of shares and options on issue, your ESOP pool size as a percentage, and the tool will generate the relevant number of ESOP pool shares.

Excel version

how to set up an ESOP: a step-by-step guide

(revised 11 February 2020)

introduction

Employee share option plans (or ESOPs) are a key tool for startups to incentivise staff and hire talent.

To make it easy, we’ve put together this guide to help you through the process of adopting your ESOP, setting up your option pool, and granting options.

Related guides you might also find useful:

Ok, let’s get started. Here are the steps that you need to take in order to set up an ESOP in your startup. This is based on industry standard for startups that have a headco and employees based in Singapore – your mileage may vary for companies domiciled in other countries.

1. draft the ESOP rules

Your ESOP rules set out the terms that apply to all options granted under the plan, including the process for granting options, how and when employees can exercise their options, and what happens to the options on an exit event, or if an employee leaves.

If you’re using our ESOP, that document will include the following schedules:

  • schedule 1 – a grant letter setting out the terms of the options you want to grant to recipients
  • schedule 2 – the form of the exercise notice to be delivered to the company when an option holder wants to exercise their vested options
  • schedule 3 – an option certificate which records the number of options, exercise price and vesting provisions.

2. approve the rules and the option pool

Once you are happy with your ESOP rules, your directors and shareholders will need to sign some corporate approval documents to adopt the ESOP rules and set up your option pool.

For Singapore companies, these resolutions will typically be prepared by your corporate secretary. If your company is based elsewhere in Southeast Asia, we recommend confirming this step with a local law firm.

board and shareholder approval

You should ask your corporate secretary to prepare a set of directors’ resolutions in writing for the directors of your company to sign and a similar set of shareholders’ resolutions in writing for your existing shareholders to sign. The resolutions should include the following:

  • approval of the ESOP rules
  • the total number of options in the ESOP pool.
  • authorisation for the board to grant options to recipients of their choosing (up to the number available in the ESOP pool), and
  • authorization to issue shares on any exercise of the options

shareholder waivers and consents

Your constitution and shareholders’ agreement (if you have one) may include pre-emptive rights on the issue of new shares.

If this is the case, those shareholders with pre-emptive rights will need to sign a waiver in respect of any options granted under the ESOP (and any shares issued on the exercise of those options). If required, you should ask your corporate secretary to prepare this shareholders’ waiver as well.

Finally, you should also check your existing constitution and shareholders’ agreement (if any) for specific consents required from any shareholder in order to issue shares, grant options, or establish an ESOP. For instance, if you have been through an external funding round, your investor may have a veto right over the issue of any new shares or options. If that is the case, you will need that party’s written consent to grant options and issue shares under the ESOP.

Now you are ready to begin granting options.

3. grant your options

Here’s what you need to do to grant options to selected recipients.

prepare your directors’ resolutions

Each time you want to grant options, you should ask your corporate secretary to prepare a new set of directors’ resolutions in writing, approving the grant of options to a specific recipient (or list of recipients).

send each recipient their grant letter

Send each recipient:

  • a completed & signed grant letter (that includes the number of options granted, the exercise price, and the vesting schedule). Our template ESOP rules include a template letter of grant at (see schedule 1) which should form the base of each grant letter.
  • a copy of the ESOP rules attached (note: the schedules attached to the ESOP rules themselves should be left blank in all cases.)

If the recipient accepts the offer, they should counter-sign the letter of grant and return it to you.

issue the option certificate

Once you have received the countersigned letter, you can issue them their option certificate.

In our ESOP rules template, you can find the option certificate form in schedule 3 (again that schedule should be left blank and a separate option certificate provided to the recipient – i.e. you need to create a fresh, separate Word doc).

update your option register

Internally, you should also be keeping an option register, which is a record of all the options the company has granted, the vesting schedules, expiry dates, and exercise dates.

how can an option holder exercise their options?

If an option holder wants to exercise their options, the first thing to do is check whether those options have vested in accordance with the option holder’s vesting schedule and have not expired under the ESOP rules.

If the options have vested, the option holder should deliver an exercise notice to the company. Our template rules include a template exercise notice that can be used for this. If you’re using our template rules, the process for exercising options is set out in Rule 5.3.

summing up

Setting up an ESOP is not too difficult once you have a set of ESOP rules that you are happy with. In most cases, your company secretary will be able to prepare all the necessary resolutions pretty efficiently.

what happens to an employee’s share options when a company exits?

Your employer has granted you stock options as part of your remuneration package. But what does this mean when your company is sold or listed (called a liquidity event), and more importantly – when do you get your money?

In this ‘Tricky Clauses’ guide we discuss how ESOPs work for employees of startups in Southeast Asia when a liquidity event occurs.

Other installments in our Tricky Clauses series:

a quick recap on ESOPs

Under an ESOP, an employee receives options over shares in a company. Those options typically vest over a period of 3-4 years.

When an option has vested, this means the employee can exercise it and purchase a share in the company. Often, employees wait for a liquidity event before exercising vested options. This is because the employee has to pay an exercise price to exercise options, and may also be liable for tax. If an employee waits until a liquidity event occurs before exercising options, they can sell the shares in that liquidity event and (ideally) get some upside after paying their exercise price and tax bill.

what is a liquidity event?

A Iiquidity event is a transaction that enables all or a substantial portion of the company’s shares to be sold. This is typically an exit transaction (i.e. a sale of the company or its assets in a private transaction) or a listing on a stock exchange.

what does a liquidity event usually mean for an employee holding options?

In Southeast Asia, employee share options often fully accelerate on a liquidity event. This means that, on an exit or a listing, all unvested options immediately vest, and employees can exercise all of their options and receive shares in the company.

Employees can then participate in that liquidity event, by selling their shares to the buyer of the company or on the stock exchange, or by receiving profits out of a sale of the company’s assets.

Under this scenario, called single trigger acceleration, employees get the chance to exercise all of their options and cash in the resulting shares, no matter how long they have been with the company. As you can see, this is an employee-friendly scenario.

what other scenarios are out there?

Another scenario you sometimes see is called ‘double trigger acceleration’

In some cases, two events need to occur before an employee gets to exercise all of their options:

  • the company has a liquidity event, and
  • the company or acquirer terminates the employee in close proximity to the liquidity event – (e.g. within a year).

This means that if an acquirer retains an employee, she or he can only exercise any options that have already vested, and needs to keep working at the company until the end of their vesting period before they can exercise the rest of their options. Only employees who are retrenched or made redundant soon after the liquidity event can exercise all of their unvested options (this is the second “trigger” in action).

For those employees who are retained, it is common for the acquirer to trade options in the target company for options over shares in the acquirer. This can be good for employees if the acquirer is a listed company, as it creates liquidity for the employees as options vest.

Double trigger acceleration is the most common position in Silicon Valley deals. If you’re an employee, this means you don’t automatically get to cash in when the company exits, unless the acquirer also lets you go shortly after the acquisition.

From the company’s perspective, double trigger acceleration can make the company more attractive to potential acquirers, as those acquirers will have some comfort that employees are less likely to leave soon after an acquisition.

(Confused with startup jargon? Head over to our startup glossary.)

what can companies and employees expect in the future?

Over the past year or so, we’ve seen more VC deals in Singapore adopt double-trigger acceleration, and we think we will see more of this as deals generally head towards more Silicon Valley-style terms.

Want to discuss your ESOP plan or thinking of putting one in place? Get in touch with one of our startup lawyers.

other ESOP resources for you to explore

kindrik newsletter

explore our case studies

grain-simmonds-stewart-client

grain

Singapore based and venture backed food technology startup Grain has fed thousands of happy customers delicious and wholesome meals, delivered in a few simple clicks.

Yi Sung Yong, Co-founder and Head of Product, recently talked to Kindrik Partners about his company and how he has found working with Kindrik Partners on their first capital raise.

the grain story

With backgrounds in management consulting and previous experience in IT startups, the 4 founders of Grain (Sung, Rifeng Gao, Isaac Tam and Ernest Sim, all recently named in the Forbes Asia 30 under 30 list) wanted to start a new and ambitious business in 2014, so they settled on changing the future of food delivery.

Since its recent beginnings, Grain is now described as a restaurant in the cloud and Uber for food in Singapore. It provides a convenient web and app delivery service for affordable and tasty food that is also good for you, offering 4 different meals each day which rotate weekly. Customers in the busy Singapore areas don’t pay for delivery and have no minimum spend.

After securing significant Series A funding, they now have major plans to offer more meals, improve operational efficiency by adding mobile distribution hub vans, increase headcount namely on the developer side and eventually to expand the business into China, including Hong Kong, and also Indonesia.

challenges

Sung says that given the diversity of food and size of the global industry, competition in the food market is building but there is still plenty of opportunity in the market. Whilst food delivery giant Food Panda largely dominates the South East Asian food delivery scene, acting as a middleman between restaurants and hungry consumers, Grain differentiates itself by offering a complete full stack food service. The entire supply chain is produced and controlled by them from one Singapore site, from the website and app business to cooking and delivery.

He also notes that whilst establishing a business and raising funds can be stressful, post-funding, hiring, onboarding and ongoing people management is their biggest challenge as they continue to grow.

working with kindrik partners

Sung’s previous experience of lawyers was that they were slow moving and traditional type lawyers that did not understand the pace of startup life.

For their first capital raise, Grain were referred to Kindrik Partners partner Lee Bagshaw through 500 Startups managing partner Khailee Ng, along with another Singaporean law firm. The referral happened on a Thursday, Lee got in touch immediately via WhatsApp and the term sheet was ready to go on the Friday. Grain did not receive a response from the other firm until the following Monday at which point the deal was well and truly on its way.

Sung says that it was Kindrik Partners’s speed and execution, WhatsApp versus long emails, moving like a startup that impressed him the most.

Kindrik Partners went on to assist Grain implement several convertible notes to secure short term bridge financing and raise of SG$2,500,000 for their Series A funding round, including investment from NSI Ventures, 500 Startups, Digital Media Partners and Ivan Lee (who founded and sold Thai Express in Singapore).

In addition to maintaining the startup pace and charging extremely reasonable legal fees, Sung really appreciated that Kindrik Partners drafted the documents from a founder’s versus lawyer’s perspective, ensuring the documents reflected Grain’s commercial motives without overkill on the legal jargon; Lee just got everything we thought we required and also pointed out the things we didn’t know we needed.

summing up

Given Grain have already delivered over 100,000 meals to ravenous Singapore residents alone, it’s looking likely that this startup will continue to eat up the market. Kindrik Partners will certainly be ready to move at speed for what seems like an inevitable growth and success.

Explore Grain.

[Note: The firm’s name was changed to Kindrik Partners in July 2020 and references to the firm’s previous name have been updated.]

90-seconds-simmonds-stewart-client

90 seconds

Auckland based startup 90 Seconds is the world’s leading cloud video production platform, allowing brands to purchase, plan, shoot, edit and review video anywhere in the world, online and on mobile.

Tim Norton, Founder and CEO, and Richard Chew, CFO, recently talked to us about 90 Second’s Series A capital raise and how they have found working with Kindrik Partners.

the 90 seconds story

Tim has been building tech companies for the last 14 years from SaaS to video platforms. It was after founding a media company that profiled the startup community through print and video, that Tim realised how hard it was to create videos. He says that the process was varied, it was difficult to shoot between countries and despite the fact that online video content was growing in popularity, professional videos were not easy to make.

This led to Tim’s idea to connect people around the world in order to create professional videos. 90 Seconds was launched in 2010, with Tim and one other developer creating online video production tools, off the back of seed and angel investment.

The concept and tools grew, and Tim managed to solve his previous issues through the creation of a cloud-based platform, which lets users handle almost every part of the video production process in one place. Brands can purchase, plan, shoot, edit and review video from the platform anywhere in the world, online and on mobile.

It was always part of Tim’s vision to build a truly global company, so two years in Tim began to establish a presence in Japan, Singapore, Australia, on top of NZ and the UK. The company became profitable in 2014 and Richard also joined as CFO. In 2015, Tim decided to hire a Head of Talent and they grew from 20 to 78 people in under a year. They then secured NZD$11m through their Series A capital raise led by Sequoia in 2016.

90 Seconds have now worked with more than 1000 brands including Google, Barclays, PayPal, Visa and Sony to produce over 10,000 high quality, fast, easy and affordable videos, in 70 countries.

The company has a global team working across Singapore, London, Tokyo, Manila, Sydney and Auckland, and they hope to open new offices in San Francisco, New York, Hong Kong and Berlin going forward.

Tim thinks that 90 Seconds has just scratched the surface of the global opportunity for cloud-based video production. They will continue to focus on their global growth and make video production even faster, as fast as Uber, publishing professional videos within anywhere between 24 hours to two to 3 weeks, no matter in the world the video creators are. They also plan to continue to develop the mobile version of their software so clients can manage every part of the production process on their tablets or smartphones.

90 Seconds Product Photo - Project with shoot in background

challenges

Tim and Richard both agree that talent acquisition and management is the key to ensuring the success of 90 Seconds, as well as scaling growth at the right time. Tim says that we always need to hire as the business continues to grow, finding the right people to do the job within budget, is definitely an art.

There is definitely competition in the industry which comes in two types. The first being companies who have been around for the same time or longer than 90 whose established business practice. The second is startups, who have the speed and agility to move quickly and innovate. However, Tim says 90 Seconds has a unique position given their stage of growth. They not only understand the industry and are experienced enough to compete with established business but they are also nimble enough to compete with new ones, having the capacity to completely revamp their current product.

working with kindrik partners

Tim and Richard have both worked with lawyers throughout their careers and had varied experiences, prior to their first capital raise, 90 Seconds brought lawyers in get the job done and keep legal costs at a minimum.

They were recommended Kindrik Partners by Sequoia, the key investor leading the capital raising process, who have invested in a number of the world’s leading tech companies including Apple, Google, YouTube and Airbnb. Lee Bagshaw’s was the lead partner for the deal given his background in fund raising for global startups and extensive experience negotiating deals with Sequoia.

The 90 Seconds team worked closely with Lee and Chris Wilson on the intricate transaction which involved a re-domicile, re-structure and Series A all rolled into one, as well as a broad range of investors, from publicly listed companies, venture capital firms and private investors such as SKY TV New Zealand, Airtree Ventures, Beenext and Oleg Tscheltzoff founder of Fotolia.

Tim describes the process as being much longer than he expected, taking 6 months. He says it was like a giant Jenga of risk, investors and issues to manage and at times he was keen to concede on points to move the deal on. However, he says Lee kept them focused on the key issues and eventually they nailed it, and got a deal far better than I expected with Tim feeling more powerful as a founder and entrepreneur through Lee’s advice. Richard also notes that Lee’s knowledge and experience with Sequoia was completely invaluable.

Tim and Richard both agree that this process showed how important it is to partner with lawyers who have hands on experience in dealing with the legal and commercial complexity of capital raising for a global company. Tim notes that when you work with a range of investors on a global deal, you need a legal partner to get the deal done and Kindrik Partners provided the best advice which got them a big outcome.

summing up

90 Seconds are an inspiring example of a company with humble NZ beginnings, demonstrating a fast-growing and rapidly scaling business model, as well as attracting major technology investment players.

Sequoia’s backing shows that big US VCs now view New Zealand startups as global opportunities. Kindrik Partners will be closely watching 90 Seconds continue its rapid growth to become a significant global player.

Explore 90 Seconds.

[Note: The firm’s name was changed to Kindrik Partners in July 2020 and references to the firm’s previous name have been updated.]

pixibo

Singapore-based Pixibo provides personalised size and fit recommendations in real time for online retailers and their customers. The fashion-tech startup worked with Kindrik Partners on their recent series A raise.

We spoke to founder and CEO Rohit Kumar on Pixibo, the capital raising journey, and working with Kindrik Partners.

pixibo’s story

Rohit is an ex-Googler with experience across Europe and India, before heading to Singapore to head up operations for e-commerce advertising company Sociomantic. Between 2013 and early 2016 he launched and managed all of Sociomantic’s APAC operations and was part of the team that sold the business to dunnhumby, a Tesco company.

It was at Sociomantic that Rohit identified an issue plaguing fashion e-commerce sites. People were browsing clothes online, but very few of those visits converted into sales. “The average conversion rate is 1.5%”, says Rohit.

Pixibo’s technology was formally launched in 2018, after a few years in development.  The platform makes real-time size recommendations, personalised for every shopper and for every brand and SKU. For a retailer this boosts conversion rates, reduces return rate and improves customer satisfaction.  Its size recommendation engine is entirely white labelled and  can be natively integrated into online stores.

 “In online shopping, there’s a lot of pain points, from finding something you like, to working out which size is correct for you,” says Rohit.

“Decision fatigue can come in, reducing sales and resulting in increased return rates. The Pixibo platform works to reduce the friction felt by the consumer and the retailer.”

working with kindrik partners

“I was educating myself about series A rounds when I came across Kindrik Partners’s content online,” Rohit says.

“It was my first time doing an institutional round so I was spending more time online trying to get my head around the legal terminology and the types of things that show up. Drag alongs, tag alongs, liquidation preference clauses. There’s a lot to understand.”

(confused? see our startup glossary )

“It looked like Kindrik Partners were the best lawyers for startups,” says Rohit.

“It was clear from the content that was available online that it was their area of expertise. When I eventually needed to bring in a lawyer to help with my round, I reached out.”

on the series A round

Pixibo already had several angel investors prior to their series A round in 2018, but the startup did not have any VCs on board, so the experience was new.

 “We had VPs from Google who invested at an early stage, as well as strong private angel investors. But this was the first institutional round, and it felt very different.”

A big learning was how much longer the process took. “I thought you’d just go out to market, pitch, and then get them to sign. I eventually came to understand the level of process that institutional investors require, and how this stretches out the timeline.”

“There’s a great level of detail required. From investor interest to the term sheet to drafting the shareholder’s agreement, share subscription agreement and the whole nine yards, to signing, to getting money in the bank… it can take a long time!”

Fortunately, runway was less of a concern for Pixibo. “We weren’t in a rush. We had revenue, so there was no immediate need to get funding in”, says Rohit. “We already had a recurring revenue from our licence fees we were charging. That started conversations for us with investors, too.”

working with kindrik partners

Rohit found working with Kindrik Partners and partner Lee Bagshaw provided a lot of value during the capital raising process.

“Working with Lee was great. He was very responsive to my requests and concerns and was always happy to get on a call if need be to walk through things with me.”

Kindrik Partners’s experience in capital raising in Southeast Asia was also an asset to Pixibo.

“As a first time founder, sometimes you’re like wait, hang on, why is that in there? Lee was invaluable in these situations. He understood what terms were negotiable and what terms weren’t, and was instrumental during all of the back and forth with investors.”

tips for founders embarking on their A round

Rohit has a few tips for those entrepreneurs who are considering going out to do their series A round.

  • start out 6 -8 months before you need the capital: especially if it’s your first institutional round (it gets easier with a follow-on round, because you’ll have existing investors to help you get your foot in the door).
  • consider a rolling close: since you’re looking for investors who are the right fit in a long-term partnership, having a rolling close allowed Pixibo to get the money in the bank from the investors who were committed, while continuing to find the perfect fit to close out our round.
  • beware the temptation to think that any money will do: in the beginning, the temptation is to look for anyone with a cheque book, but then you get smarter. Find the VC’s thesis and their sweet spot, and get smarter at looking at their portfolio to see if you fit in. Who will be interested in your story?
  • don’t raise too soon: Traction is important. Wait until you’re in a strong position to raise, if you can. In our case, as we’re B2B, we had clear proof points that our product works, solves a real problem for online retailers and that they are willing to pay us for it. Investors will want to see that you have put in the hard work and that capital will accelerate growth.
  • have a plan for the money. You have to articulate why you need capital now, and how it will help your business.

what’s to come for pixibo

The future is bright for Pixibo, and Rohit is looking ahead to expand into new markets. “The most exciting thing about us is that we’re location agnostic. The problems retailers have in Singapore are the same ones that they have in Sydney. The opportunity is massive.”

[Note: The firm’s name was changed to Kindrik Partners in July 2020 and references to the firm’s previous name have been updated.]

see all case studies